Second Treatise of Government
The Second Treatise of Government is John Locke’s 1689 essay (the second of his Two Treatises) and the single most influential statement of natural-rights political theory. It is the keystone of the natural-law lineage as the libertarian tradition receives it.
The Argument
Locke begins not with the state but with the state of nature: a condition of “perfect freedom” and equality that is nonetheless not a state of license, because it “has a law of nature to govern it… and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.” Rights and obligations are thus prior to government, not created by it.
Property is the Treatise’s most consequential move. Although the earth is given to mankind in common, “every man has a property in his own person: this no body has any right to but himself.” By mixing the “labour of his body, and the work of his hands” with unowned nature, a person makes external things his own — property arises pre-politically and pre-consensually, subject to the early “Lockean provisos” (leave “enough, and as good” for others; do not let it spoil). This labour theory of acquisition is the direct ancestor of the libertarian homesteading principle.
Government by consent. Because men are naturally free, legitimate political power can arise only by consent, and men consent to it for one end: the “mutual preservation of their lives, liberties and estates, which I call by the general name, property.” Government is therefore a fiduciary trust, strictly limited to that purpose.
The right of revolution. When a government invades the rights it was instituted to protect — when it acts without law, or for its own ends — it dissolves the trust and “the people” may resume their power. This is the Treatise’s revolutionary edge and the seed of the American founding’s later phrase, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Place in This Wiki
The Second Treatise is the hinge between classical natural law and modern liberty. It receives the Ciceronian and Grotian natural-law inheritance and converts it into a theory of individual rights and limited government, which Rothbard later radicalizes into anarcho-capitalism and Spooner into individualist anarchism. Its labour-mixing account underlies Nonaggression and Property Rights. Locke remains a limited-government theorist, not an anarchist — the point at which his heirs divide.
See Also
- John Locke - author reference
- Natural Law and Natural Order - the tradition this text anchors
- The Rights of War and Peace - Grotius’s natural-law theory that Locke drew on
- Nonaggression and Property Rights - the libertarian homesteading principle descended from Locke
- The Ethics of Liberty - Rothbard’s natural-rights radicalization
- Natural Law; or The Science of Justice - Spooner’s anarchist radicalization of Locke’s natural rights
- The Whole Duty of Man According to the Law of Nature - Pufendorf’s natural-law systematization that Locke read
- The Declaration of Independence - the political application of Locke’s natural-rights theory
- Rights of Man - Paine’s revolutionary extension of Lockean natural rights
- Sociality - the Pufendorfian sociality apparatus Locke read and sharpened
- Homesteading - The libertarian theory of how unowned things first become property: by being put to use — Locke’s labor-mixing, Rothbard’s first-use-first-own.
Sources
- Locke, Second Treatise of Government (Full Text) - Ch. II (state of nature, law of nature), Ch. V (property and labour-mixing), Chs. VIII–XIX (consent, trust, and dissolution of government)