Galtland Index

War Making and State Making as Organized Crime

4 min read

War Making and State Making as Organized Crime

Charles Tilly’s 1985 essay is the explicit source for the state-as-protection-racket formulation that the wiki previously had only through later Tilly material. It treats war making, state making, protection, and extraction as interdependent activities through which European national states arose.

Text Status

The raw source is a full-text ingest from an independent PDF mirror of chapter 5 of Bringing the State Back In, edited by Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol (Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 169-191. The PDF extraction presented paired pages side by side; the raw ingest reorders the pages into reading order and corrects only obvious OCR in the famous opening sentence.

The canonical citation remains the Cambridge University Press volume. The mirror is useful for research access, but it should not be treated as a publisher-authorized open-access edition.

Provenance and Rights

This is a commercially copyrighted Cambridge University Press chapter. The wiki holds the full text for personal-research / fair-use purposes from an independent PDF mirror. Citation-grade quotation should be checked against the printed Cambridge volume or another authorized copy.

What the Essay Argues

Tilly opens with the direct analogy: if protection rackets represent organized crime at its smoothest, then war making and state making are “quintessential protection rackets with the advantage of legitimacy.” The point is not that every state official is personally a criminal. It is that the activities that made European states - monopoly of coercion, suppression of rivals, sale of protection, and extraction of resources - occupy the same analytical continuum as banditry, piracy, gang rivalry, and policing.

The formal framework separates four state activities:

  • War making: eliminating or neutralizing rivals outside the territory.
  • State making: eliminating or neutralizing rivals inside the territory.
  • Protection: eliminating or neutralizing the enemies of clients.
  • Extraction: acquiring the means to carry out the first three activities.

Those activities reinforce one another. War requires extraction; extraction builds fiscal and administrative machinery; state making suppresses internal competitors; protection binds favored classes to the regime. The result is a historical mechanism rather than a social-contract story.

Relation to Coercion, Capital, and European States

Coercion, Capital, and European States develops the broader capital/coercion typology, but the 1985 essay is the concise source for the organized-crime analogy and the war-making/state-making/protection/extraction quadruple. The two sources should now be used together: the essay for the explicit protection-racket thesis, the later book for the thousand-year European typology.

Place in This Wiki

Tilly is not a libertarian. The convergence with State Power and Intervention and Political Means and Economic Means is descriptive: states and organized predation can be analyzed through overlapping coercive mechanisms. Tilly does not infer market anarchism, the nonaggression principle, or abolition of the state from that diagnosis.

The article is especially important for War and State Formation, because it supplies the direct 1985 source behind the protection-racket formulation.

See Also

Sources

Graph View

Backlinks