Jurisdictional Competition

Jurisdictional competition, in Davidson and Rees-Mogg’s The Sovereign Individual, is the prediction that once wealth and talent can move freely between territories, governments must compete for residents the way firms compete for customers. As the authors put it, governments “will ultimately have little choice but to treat populations in territories they serve more like customers, and less in the way that organized criminals treat the victims of a shakedown racket.”

From Subjects to Customers

The argument is the political consequence of the cybereconomy. When the most valuable wealth is informational and can be earned and held anywhere, governments “that attempt to charge too much as the price of domicile will merely drive away their best customers.” Tax becomes a price, residence becomes a purchase, and citizens, in the book’s phrase, “will no longer be citizens as we know them, but customers.” The authors expect a “proliferation of jurisdictions” and “sovereignty services” competing on market terms, with “proliferating experimentation in new ways of enforcing contracts and otherwise securing the safety of persons and property” — a market in protection and law adjacent to market anarchism and private security.

Lane’s Three Modes of Control

To explain why this matters, Davidson and Rees-Mogg borrow economic historian Frederic Lane’s analysis of government as “an economic unit that sells protection”. Lane distinguished three ways the protection-selling enterprise can be controlled, each with different incentives:

  • Proprietors — a hereditary owner (a medieval lord, the Sultan of Brunei) who runs the territory to maximize profit. Proprietors cut costs but keep the price (tax) as high as their monopoly allows.
  • Employees — bureaucracies and political classes that run government for their own benefit. They favor maximizing size and employment, resist cost-cutting, and tend toward chronic deficits.
  • Customers — those who actually pay for protection and control the government, as in the medieval merchant republics like Venice, the ancient democracies, or the early American republic’s limited franchise. “Where customers rule, governments are lean and generally unobtrusive, with low operating costs, minimal employment, and low taxes.”

The book argues the industrial nation-state, with universal-franchise mass democracy, is largely employee-controlled — which explains its bias toward growth, deficits, and high taxes (the dynamic the wiki tracks under public choice). Jurisdictional competition is the mechanism that forces a shift toward customer control: mobile megapolitical conditions let the payers exit, and exit disciplines the price.

Relation to the Wiki

This is the mirror image of citizenship and state bargaining: Tilly describes how rulers, needing taxes and manpower for war, bargained rights into existence and bound subjects into citizens; Davidson and Rees-Mogg describe the reverse current, in which falling returns to violence and mobile wealth unwind that bargain and turn citizens back into customers. It also extends the protection-pricing logic of Tilly’s protection rackets — both treat the state as a protection seller, but the Sovereign Individual thesis asks what happens to the racket when the victims can finally shop elsewhere.

Limits

Confidence is low. The customer/exit dynamic is real and visible at the margins (tax-competitive small states, “golden visa” and residency-by-investment markets, corporate domicile shopping), but the book’s strong prediction — that jurisdictional competition would force most governments into lean, low-tax customer service within a generation — has not broadly materialized. States have coordinated against tax competition, expanded extraterritorial reach (citizenship-based taxation, information-sharing, exit taxes), and retained large fiscal capacity. Treat this as a directional tendency the book overstated, not a law.

See Also

Sources

  • The Sovereign Individual (Full Text Aggregate) - Chapter 1 (“treat populations … more like customers”), Chapter 5 (“The Life and Death of the Nation-State”, Lane’s proprietors/employees/customers typology), and the “sovereignty services” passages