Galtland Index

Federal Reserve

7 min read

Federal Reserve

The Federal Reserve is the central bank of the United States, and in this wiki’s Austrian reading it is not a neutral stabilizer of money but a government-enforced banking cartel. By monopolizing note issue and standing ready to backstop the banks, the Fed weakens the two market limits — bank runs and the loss of reserves to competitors — that otherwise discipline fractional-reserve lending. The result is systematic credit expansion, the inflation that transfers wealth to those who spend the new money first, and the boom-and-bust cycle that follows.

What the Fed Is: The Cartel-Origin Thesis

On Rothbard’s account in The Case Against the Fed, the United States was the last major nation to adopt central banking, taking up the Federal Reserve System in 1913. The official story — that the Fed arose after the Panic of 1907 as a needed lender of last resort — is, he argues, a myth spread by the institution’s apologists. The reality he reconstructs is that the drive came from Wall Street and allied bankers, with the Morgan, Rockefeller, and Kuhn-Loeb interests working in concert, and culminated in the secret 1910 drafting session at Jekyll Island.

Their motive was competitive discipline. A banking cartel, like any cartel, is hard to sustain on a free market because each member has an incentive to break ranks; it holds together only when the government enforces it. The central bank supplies exactly that enforcement. It cartelizes the private commercial banks so they can expand credit in uniform step, removing the penalty that a free market imposes on any single bank that inflates faster than its rivals. The Fed, in this reading, is the device by which the banks escaped the market’s check on their own counterfeiting.

The Money Mechanics: Reserves, Credit Creation, and the Counterfeiting Analogy

Under fractional-reserve banking, a bank issues more warehouse receipts — notes and demand deposits, which Rothbard treats as economically and legally equivalent — than it holds in actual cash. Each new receipt enters the money supply as a substitute for cash, so the act of lending against fictitious reserves creates new money out of nothing.

Rothbard’s central analogy is that this is counterfeiting. A successful counterfeiter fashions a near-valueless object that passes as money; the fractional-reserve banker does the same with paper claims that no underlying cash backs. On a free market two forces hold the practice in check: a possible loss of confidence leading to a bank run, and the loss of reserves whenever one bank expands credit faster than the others and must redeem to them. The Fed alleviates both — as lender of last resort it cushions the run, and by controlling legal reserve requirements and supplying base reserves it lets the whole banking system inflate together. The inflation this enables is not neutral. The new money reaches early receivers first and bids up prices before later receivers feel it, so monetary expansion is a hidden transfer of wealth from those who get the new money last to those who get it first.

The Austrian Business-Cycle Role

Because the Fed manufactures credit unbacked by genuine saving, it pushes the loan rate below the rate at which voluntary saving and time preference would settle, and this is the trigger of the Austrian business cycle. Artificially cheap credit lures entrepreneurs into lengthened, capital-intensive projects that the real savings of the economy cannot finish; the boom is the malinvestment phase, and the bust is the unavoidable correction. The wiki’s case study is the Great Depression: in America’s Great Depression, Rothbard reads the credit inflation the Fed engineered through the 1920s as the cause of the structural distortions that made the 1929 crash inevitable. The detailed mechanism — how Fed-created reserves become a cluster of entrepreneurial errors — is worked out in Rothbard on Fed-Induced Booms.

The Austrian-vs-Monetarist Split

Not every free-market critic of the Fed wants it gone. Friedman and the Chicago school also fault central banking, but for a different sin. In The Role of Monetary Policy, Friedman argues that monetary policy works on the economy only with long and variable lags, so discretionary fine-tuning makes the authority step on the brake or the accelerator too hard and amplifies the swings it means to dampen. His remedy is not abolition but a binding rule: have the central bank commit publicly to a steady, low rate of money growth — he suggests something near 3 to 5 percent a year — and stop trying to manage the cycle by hand. The Austrians answer that managing money at all is the disease, not merely the discretion with which it is managed: the problem is the cartelized credit creation itself, which no growth rule can make sound. That fault line — rule-bind the Fed versus abolish it and return to hard money — is the spine of the wiki’s monetary economics and is developed at length in Austrian Economics vs the Chicago School.

See Also

Sources

Graph View

Backlinks